Interview with Jean-Gabriel Fernandez

This is an interview I had with a French journalism student Jean-Gabriel Ferndandez.

Parts of it are redacted, for two reasons. First reason is that some of this is just tiresome arranging of the deal and the second reason is that parts of it relate to certain personal information that I feel wouldn’t be wise to discern now, especially with the upcoming plans I have. In any case, redacted parts are of no importance for discussing actual issues.

(first messages redacted)

Hello, and thank you very much!

I am aware some questions already have answers in your blog, but it is a necessary part of the interview process so you’re given the full ability to screen what may or may not be printed. I hope this is alright with you. What is going to interest me here, besides your beliefs, is your personal experience, the path that lead you where you are now in life. I encourage you to express yourself freely even if something you’d like to say isn’t covered by my questions!

First of all, could you introduce yourself – either with your real name of a fake name you are okay with me using? How old are you and where do you live (city, country)? What communities relating to inceldom are you a part of or have you been a part of – dedicated subreddits, your blog, love-shy… what else?

Second, can you summarize to me in clear terms I could (and certainly will) directly quote what you consider inceldom to be, what your views on sexuality and women are? I am unwilling to quote bits and pieces of your long and numerous blog posts on the subject for fear of misrepresenting what you mean.

How was your childhood? Did you grow up with your parents, was it a happy time in your life, did you have many friends? When and how did you first discover your sexuality? How did it impact the way you interacted with people around you? Did it change the vision you had of women? Can you remember any specific examples that may illustrate how you shaped your view of sexuality and/or women, one or several events that helped you shape your worldview? Have you ever suffered from conditions such as autism, anxiety disorders or depression, which are very common according to Would you say you had many friends growing up, in school and early adult life, and how would you rate your ability to relate to other people?

What meaning does the word carry, for you? When and why did you start considering yourself an incel? Was it related to online activities, discovering incel-related communities? You’ve been very active in such communities; what brought you to that, what motivated you? How would you qualify those communities? Are they welcoming, easy to fit in, did they help you on a personal/intimate level? What are the leading ideas that you’ve found are often central to discussions there? I would simply life you to express what you genuinely think of your experience with forums and websites dedicated to incels, please go wild and express all you can think of! Those places generally have a bad reputation, what would you say to people hating on them?

Could you give me a rundown on your past relationships and experiences with women? If that is fine with you, I would also like you to share what your current relationship is like. Who is your girlfriend, how did you meet and how do you feel towards her? I heard you have had a daughter, what can you tell me about her, and what is your relationship with her? Has your worldview evolved since you became a father, and if so how much?

I have plenty of follow-up questions if you’re still feeling up to discuss after that. Either way, I am immensely grateful you accept to answer even just those! Anything you can give me is a precious insight I will try to exploit to the best of my ability. Thank you very much again (and sorry for the many questions, I hope it’s not too much of a bother for you)!


Sure, I’ll reply, it will just take some time. 

” First of all, could you introduce yourself – either with your real name of a fake name you are okay with me using? How old are you and where do you live (city, country)? What communities relating to inceldom are you a part of or have you been a part of – dedicated subreddits, your blog, love-shy… what else?”

My real name had never been disclosed by me or anywhere online. There are several versions of what is believed to be my real name online but none of them are actually my name (remaining explanation on this redacted) I am currently 28 years old and living in (redacted)  for the last 9 months as I have gained employment there. I was born and am actually a citizen of Croatia, from Zagreb (the capital). My heritage is Serbian (my ancestors moved to Croatia in the 18th century).  I would not like to disclose where I am currently in (redacted), as I have a group of haters dedicated to tracking me down. But I feel it is not so important anyway.
The first incel community I have encountered had been in March-April 2008, which was at the time more about love-shyness (as a romantic phobia that makes one unable to approach men/women with romantic intent) than incel as a form of inability to enter relationships/sexual intercourse – however, in time this changed and more and more incel people appeared while the love-shy aspect and people who were love-shy faded into a background. During that time there was another incel community, Incel Support, but it was hated by members as it was extremely leftist and politically correct. It had shut down for reasons unknown to me in 2013. 
I started my blog in 2012. Around 2013/2014 a place called PUAHate appeared and also started attracting some incels but I didn’t like it as it was really anti-intellectual. This place changed its name after it had been revealed that Elliot Roger was a member of it. It changed its name to SlutHate. Today several such forums exist, like Lookism etc but I never joined them and consider them immature and anti-intellectual.
As for Reddit, I started the r/incels subreeddit there but I lost control over it in July 2016, after my account had been banned there. After I got banned the place was flooded by idiots from Sluthate and similar places and was finally banned in Nov 2017. 
I am currently planning to open a forum which would house incels, love-shy people and MAPs (minority attracted people) and would have none of the crazy issues that plague current incel communities like cultism (insistence on some “normies”, insistence that you can’t be an incel if you ever kissed or had sex etc). 

“Second, can you summarize to me in clear terms I could (and certainly will) directly quote what you consider inceldom to be, what your views on sexuality and women are? I am unwilling to quote bits and pieces of your long and numerous blog posts on the subject for fear of misrepresenting what you mean.”

(First question) Involuntary celibacy (colloquially incel) is chronic near-total or total absence in a person’s sexuality of intimate relationships or sexual intercourse that is occurring for reasons other than voluntary celibacy, asexuality, antisexualism, sexual abstinence, unreasonable in mate criteria and unfounded fears/dogmas.

A couple of years ago one involuntary celibate person said that, according to him, most people are to be considered in a state of absolute involuntary celibacy when they were, against their wishes, unable to obtain either of these things in more than six months :

1. a relationship

2. unpaid sex

I agree with the definition and think that more than 6 months without both of those things, and against your desire, are abnormal enough to be called incel.

More important than the exact number of months, however, is whether long periods of celibacy are a recurring pattern in an individual’s D/S/R history. Many people go without D/S/R for six-month or longer stretches, but rarely experience such problems as a constantly recurring pattern.

This goes for most people. There are, however, those people who could be considered completely non-celibate with only one of those things in their life. For example, an asexual person could only be satisfied with a relationship while a person not wanting any relationships with anybody could be satisfied with only sex. The key thing is desire.

Also, it is important to note that only unpaid sex is considered to be relevant for whether or not somebody is an involuntary celibates. Involuntary celibates who use prostitutes are still considered involuntary celibates.

(Second question) The second question is pretty vague but I will try to answer to the best of my abilities. Since around 2014 I have become a reactionary anti-feminist who believes that that women should be married off as virgins and not be allowed to vote while males should only be using prostitutes before and during marriage. I believe that four key traits of a good society are 1. monogamy 2. good religion 3. female premarital chastity 4. widely available prostitution.  Number 1 and 4 aren’t contradictory, because sleeping with prostitutes isn’t considered actual cheating in sane societies. Actual cheating is having a lover you invest in. 

I see most modern Western women as sluts one should have no moral qualms about raping and as completely incapable of a committed relationship or marriage. 
I am surprised by how quick you’re tackling this. Thank you very much!
“How was your childhood? Did you grow up with your parents, was it a happy time in your life, did you have many friends? When and how did you first discover your sexuality? How did it impact the way you interacted with people around you? Did it change the vision you had of women? Can you remember any specific examples that may illustrate how you shaped your view of sexuality and/or women, one or several events that helped you shape your worldview? Have you ever suffered from conditions such as autism, anxiety disorders or depression, which are very common according to Would you say you had many friends growing up, in school and early adult life, and how would you rate your ability to relate to other people?”

I did grow up with both of my parents, who had a stable and happy marriage. But since I was more introverted, serious and intelligent than most other children I suffered bullying in elementary school. This stopped when I started attending high school.
I discovered my sexuality quite early, masturbating as early as 9 or 10. I don’t think this discovery influenced the way I communicated with others much, You must understand that I didn’t have a sister and that all of my social circle until  around the age of 18 were males. So just masturbating didn’t change anything regarding girls at that time.  
My worldview was shaped by my incel only after I was already 25 years old or so, when I started reading the appropriate literature that explained why incel comes about. Several bad experiences I suffered with women, coupled with seeing my friends, all of whom were good people, suffering similar experiences while scum of the earth was attractive to women, and coupled with reading literature like Unwin made me realize what makes women attracted to a certain type of male and why. 
I suffered from depression  and anxiety since I was around 15 and still suffer from them a lot but was never on the autistic spectrum. 
I didn’t have many friends growing up but I have deep connections with those I do have. 
“What meaning does the word carry, for you? When and why did you start considering yourself an incel? Was it related to online activities, discovering incel-related communities? You’ve been very active in such communities; what brought you to that, what motivated you? How would you qualify those communities? Are they welcoming, easy to fit in, did they help you on a personal/intimate level? What are the leading ideas that you’ve found are often central to discussions there? I would simply life you to express what you genuinely think of your experience with forums and websites dedicated to incels, please go wild and express all you can think of! Those places generally have a bad reputation, what would you say to people hating on them? ”

In 2010 a poster on the whose nickname is Advanced (he’s long since left the forum) created the definition with the 6 months rule. I thought it was reasonable so I naturally applied it to myself since I was in that situation (way over 6 months, of course). So one could say it was related to online activities but that is hardly the point – it is just a term for what was already there. 
When I joined love-shy in 2008 I was much more interested in discussing love-shyness (romantic phobia) and didn’t know the term incel. But, as years went by and my phobia started to subside due to more experience with women, I talked less and less about love-shyness and more about incel in general. Since no longer being love-shy didn’t mean I had much more experience I started pondering what was the issue that made me unattractive to women. 
These communities are currently in steep decline, as is the rest of the society. Actual civilized debate is waning. is now led by an extreme leftist and closed to non-registered posters, and places like Incels forum are the same kind of brain-dead communities that were once Sluthate and similar sites.  This is why I want to start my own forum. One of the things that led to a decline of the incel communities are cultism and lookism.  Cultism, which I mentioned before, is a view that incels are some kind of a specific identity or whatever. That is wrong. It is often a permanent, albeit painful situation. Lookism is a view that looks are all that matters when it comes to attracting women. It is a reflection of an idiotic, superficial society and it is not the truth. Modern Western women are attracted to immorality and stupidity, not looks. 
So where once, around 2008-2013, you had mature discussions on causes and solutions to incel these have now largely waned and are replaced by brainless cultism/lookism on places like or Sluthate, while is closed off and had sunk into irrelevance.
As for the reputation of these places, I always tell people to look at actual content. My blog has a somewhat low reputation but only because those criticizing it are leftist scum  that opposes my reactionary views, just like they opposed that I write anything humanizing incels in the first place. There is a constant view that incels are “entitled”, ie believing they are owed something, when this simply isn’t true for most of them. This “entitlement” is a leftist buzzword to attack all white males and nothing else.
However, current anti-intellectual incels sites like Incels. me have a deservingly bad reputation, as they are filled with crazy people and ideas. 
To people hating these sites I’d say to read the actual content of each of them. Some people have started hating the term “incel” itself, but this is also insane- it only means the 6 month deprivation thing and isn’t connected to any particular ideas on politics or whatever. To believe otherwise is also crazy. 

“Could you give me a rundown on your past relationships and experiences with women? If that is fine with you, I would also like you to share what your current relationship is like. Who is your girlfriend, how did you meet and how do you feel towards her? I heard you have had a daughter, what can you tell me about her, and what is your relationship with her? Has your worldview evolved since you became a father, and if so how much?”

It is difficult to answer this briefly and in a non-confusing way.
I basically had no contact with women until I was around 18. No kisses, nothing.  I had my first kiss around late 2006, and kissed some more girls later on but this was all pretty insignificant.
The first extremely significant event of my life regarding women happened in 2007-2008, regarding a woman I called “The Fatal One”. This was a girl who I met on some dating app and who was extremely aggressive regarding her attraction to me, basically wanting a relationship and sex. But I made a mistake and said I don’t want to commit because I was scared of missing her since she was leaving for about a month and a half.  When I realized my mistake it was already too late and she no longer wanted to be with me, though she did talk to me and arrange meetings later on, to which she’d never appear. Since I couldn’t find another girl I gradually became more and more obsessed, and about one year later, in 2008, I made a post on saying I will kill myself and her (after I told the story). I didn’t mention her name or my name or anything. In any case, the person who had been an admin at the time reported me and cops came to my house and I made the mistake of cooperating with them and I told them her name. I was detained for a month due to “threats” (which was ridiculous, since she never saw these writing nor did they contain her name) but was eventually acquitted.
My first real girlfriend was with me Nov 2009- Jul 2010. We never had sex as we were both too inexperienced and shy at the time. I didn’t press it too much as I believed there is enough time. But she left me in Jul 2010 and that was a devastating shock to me.
A brief fling I had with a girl in 2011 didn’t result in sex but was significant to destroying my love-shyness, as I kissed her first.
I had sex in 2012 for the first time. The girl was slutty and had a boyfriend. We had sex twice but then her boyfriend came back and she broke it off.
My second relationship was from Oct- Nov 2012. It was a difficult one, with a person not suited for relationships at the time. We did have sex like a normal couple but the person was unstable and it was a long distance relationship so it didn’t last long. This person is now a lesbian and one of my best friends.
In 2013 I had a friend with benefits. This girl was pretty trashy and stupid, and had sex with other men at the time. It ended when she ended up in a mental hospital for 2 months and went back to her home town.

Between 2013 and 2016 I basically stopped all dating. Between the experiences I mention there were many, many failed dates and disappointments. I could no longer bear that. At that time my political views changed a lot and I became a reactionary anti-feminist who hates modern Western women and wants a return of the patriarchy (as explained in that Story of your incel post). I also did some illegal things but this I can’t go into.

In late 2014 I called that girl I used to be friends with benefits with in 2013  back to Zagreb and had unprotected sex with her multiple times since she wanted to be a mother and my haters online were mocking me that I will never reproduce. I have seen how many evil and stupid people did reproduce so I was gonna prove to them that it might not be that hard. And it worked. She got pregnant but I have never seen her since. She first returned to her town on the Adriatic and then she moved to Netherlands in early 2015, in early stages of pregnancy. She has a daughter but I have never been to Netherlands nor do I care about this daughter and she doesn’t want me  in their life either, as was the deal.  My worldview hasn’t evolved much. As I said, I have never seen my daughter but I got evidence that it isn’t so hard to breed. You have to use people around you, even if they are somewhat ill, like that girl is (she has schizophrenia). It’s the best you can do in this society. 

In early 2017 I became a Muslim and moved to (redacted) for a while.  There I was introduced into their Muslim community. I met my girlfriend via Tinder. She claimed to be 18 years old but was in fact just 17 (she lied about her age at the time). This relationship is different than the ones I had before. I now know how women are dealt with in the current non-patriarchal rotten society. My girlfriend is tightly controlled by me and my Muslim community, and she is available to them in every way. I realize now that good relationships are only possible in a patriarchal, coalpha society. 

Also, I’d like to mention one more thing. The leftists/liberals say that incels promote violence etc. But you must understand what the liberal definition of violence is to understand just how hollow that is. Liberalism is hatred of the whites. An act of rape is a crime of rape only when a white rapes. Other acts defined as rape by liberals are whites having consensual sex, whites asking a girl on a date, and every other act a white does to get a relationship and sex.  

Are you done replying? I’ve went through your answers and I find it fascinating. Thank you very much for all your insights!

I will crunch the answers you gave me and see what I can get out of them, then I may come up with follow-up questions (although what you told me seems really rich and complete already). I am very grateful to you!

(boring arrangement parts redacted)
Also, have you the 2014 article Der Spiegel made about incels? If not, I can show you. This German journalist spent 2 days with me. 

If you have things you want to share, even if I don’t ask you to, please feel free to contact me! I contacted a few other prominent incel bloggers, none of which replied to me so far. I am in touch with a french incel community, a psychiatrist specialized in the effects of celibacy in the adult life as well as a law firm to learn about the details of legislation when it comes to freedom of speech online.

I haven’t seen it in fact! I don’t speak german but I would love to see it if you wouldn’t mind.

It doesn’t matter if you don’t speak German. There is translation to it in English. This was originally published in the Aug 2014 issue of Der Spiegel. I would just like to warn you about some things in the article

1) (redacted, dealing with personal information)
2) While the article itself contains very little outright lies (I noticed just one where he claims that I said most incels aren’t employed – that’s bs, most ARE EMPLOYED) it’s tone is deliberately negative and corny. This is no surprise if you know how Der Spiegel writes about various things it sees as “extremist” -Salafists, Ukranian separatists, etc etc. Their tone is always sanctimonious and wants to present something as this big danger. He makes these stupid assertions which are true by themselves but make no sense – I didn’t look at him in the eyes at first (why would I?), I wore the same clothes two days in a row (yes, I just showered the moment before I met him in the afternoon and just threw my clothes off and went to sleep when I arrived, as it was very hot during that time in Zagreb, it’s no sign of bad hygiene or anything, my clothes were really light), he suddenly mentions that one of my friends (fschmidt) had an idea about coalpha men starting a community as a sign of extremism etc. He even starts quoting that guy who shot at Reagan at some point though he was never incel !!!
The article is a kind of leftist hack job typical for Der Spiegel. It’s designed to shame and say we’re all bad because some of us have un-PC views and that this is why we can’t have women 😀 (hahahah)
 But if you have some questions regarding it please ask
Anyway, enjoy.. (As you can see, the title itself is just slander – “Male, single, life threatening”  Guy is a moron
Thank you very much, I’ll make sure to read it carefully. I must admit I am a bit overwhelmed with all the info you’ve provided me with (which is a great thing mind you), I will need some time to sort all of it out. Until then, have a great evening!
I would just briefly say that incel is something that has always existed in one form or another. The issue is, what makes certain men incel. In modern feminist society men with intelligence and good character are incel because modern feminist society removed the need for good provider men. This is well explained in my Story of your incel article. So good men should find wives in non-feminist places like parts of Asia (Philippines come to mind) as modern Western women are currently attracted to bad men and aren’t suitable to be good wives. So one should feel no guilt about even having non-consensual sex with them. 
Thanks for this additional statement. When you say “So one should feel no guilt about even having non-consensual sex with them”, are you saying rape isn’t morally reprehensible in your opinion? Have you ever practiced it yourself?

I obviously won’t/can’t say if I practiced it myself but it is quite obvious from my posts. I believe it isn’t morally reprehensible if the raped ones are modern Western women who feminism turned into worthless scum. This doesn’t mean that all women everywhere deserve to be raped. Women in non-feminist places shouldn’t be raped and even some women in feminist places (like Amish or Mormon women in America) don’t deserve to be raped.

On a related note, many of my enemies have this fallacy that because I hate modern Western women I must hate all women. This is a basic misunderstanding of my positions. I don’t like women on location x (Western world) and time period y (modern time) and even then there are exceptions like the ones I mentioned. My enemies, since they are fools, believe I hate all women everywhere at any time, which is nonsense. 
Corollary to that, I must warn you, and you have likely already noticed, that many lies and false claims are spread about me online. Those spreading them are usually too stupid to even  be conscious that they’re lying and actually believe the nonsense they’re saying despite obvious evidence to the contrary. Of course,  I am not the only person who suffers this kind of slander- This is what I call a post-truth, fake news society. It is one of the reasons somebody like Trump had been elected. 
I see. I took good note of all that. I interviewed quite a few incels and medial professionals on the subject, I believe I can start writing the final piece as soon as tomorrow. Thanks for your cooperation.


I believe I mentioned this before but again, let me warn you that the term incel itself has gained a lot of flak and various people define it in various ways. I believe my definition withj the 6 months is the most reasonable one but there are many crazy people out there of various stripes who define it in various ways. Some see every identifying as incel as meaning you are bad (those are usually liberals) even when they themselves are incel. And some incels think even kissing or sex means you can’t be incel ever again. There are a lot of very, very sick people out there. 
(latter parts redacted as they’re merely about technical matters)
In any case, it seems this piece had been published in the Student Journal so he says it is not publicly available but offered to send the article in French if I’d like. I kinda lack the time to translate and proofread it now but will do so in due time.

Some blogs I can support

I apologize to my readers for the lack of posts. My life was quite spectacular during the last 12 months and I couldn’t bother with the blog as well. I hope new ones will be coming soon.

Meanwhile, I can support some of the new bloggers who have recently started to write against feminism and in support of  male sexualism movement (an idea that male sexuality should be reasserted) and minor-attracted people. I am not sure if there is a unified definition of a MAP, since some definition mentions being attracted to people below the age of consent and some being attracted to children (aka those 11 and below in this case). In the case of the first definition, I am definitely a MAP as well, as I believe the ages of consent in most places in the world to be ridiculously high. They should not be above the age of 12 (another issue of this problem is that liberals don’t actually support age of consent applied to anybody but white males, and would gladly see those they see as oppressed in society have sex with anybody of any age, even newborns, as explained here).

The Daily Antifeminist is very active and had already been endorsed by the veritable Eivind Berge. Now, the problem with him is that he himself admits some of his posts are satire but this is actually highly irrelevant since a) none of his posts he even describes as satire as of too immature content and actually still describe problems and ideas well b)  a reader can just decide to post as if the every post is serious. Your thoughts are still valid regardless of the post.

Other two blogs I can recommend are AmericanRifleman, a blog of a MAP, and DJTRASHporn, a blog of a male sexualist taking on neo-puritanism.

Of course, these recommendations can be rescinded at any time due to the behavior of these bloggers.

In defense of Maria Ladenburger’s fate

(A DISCLAIMER – this is not a call to violence. It is not even supporting violence in general. It is an intellectual argument that philosophically justifies a certain violent act to a point by contextualizing it within an already very difficult and bleak situation).

NECESSARY READING TO UNDERSTAND THIS POST BETTER (If you haven’t read any of these by the order outlined here)

blackpillMaria Ladenburger’s murder  doesn’t seem to have that many articles on it online, which is just what I expected. The subject is one liberals don’t like to talk about so the mainly liberal media ignored it – a young German woman was raped and drowned by a Muslim. Well, I guess it is not surprising given that it seems her own family immediately showed themselves to be massive cucks, but even without this amusing epilogue this is a story Western European media wanted to avoid.

The reason for this, as I came to realize in the recent years, isn’t just some simplistic explanation that would involve a word “political correctness”, a word that would somehow have to explain everything. The actual reasons, once they’re actually explained in a manner that relates to actual people and events and not some phrase, are that liberals erroneously believe a certain incorrect picture of the history of the world (I was gonna write more on this when I do an article on liberals in general but am having trouble finishing it)  which goes something like this – “Around 1500 AD the whole non-European world was free, happy, sane, prosperous and probably even liberal when these evil Europeans enslaved everybody. They’re the ones who caught blacks and brought them to Europe and America, they’re the ones who destroyed massive Indian populations and they should be punished as the scum they are for the rest of their existence.”

Now, as for more on the intellectual origins, I really don’t know. I’d check Roosh’s writings on Frankfurt school but you should take everything on such issues (from everybody, the problem is not Roosh himself) with a grain of salt. Intellectual history can be extremely complicated and by now it is quite irrelevant anyway.

The point that is relevant to this post is that liberals know nothing about things like Arab slave trade and its extremely high rates of mutilation and mortality, have no idea that Arab pirates captured European slaves up to 18th century, that most of North America in 1500 AD was huge patches of empty land, and, most importantly, can’t understand the idea that not a single acre of the world was liberal in 1500 AD and that these European “conquerors” were the first to become liberal.and spread this disease to some parts of the remaining world (basically just North America, Australia and some parts of South America), with huge areas of the world never ever becoming liberal.  Amazingly, these areas that never became liberal are some that liberals tend to think about most fondly, at least in their writings. Of course, actually living there is usually a different story though, luckily, having strong convictions about this got a few of the more convinced liberals killed.

In the lieu of these misconceptions, liberals have no real problems with classes they see as underprivileged killing the privileged ones. What they do have a problem with is the underprivileged classes still being presented in what might be a bad light to some people. Now, if everybody became liberal tomorrow there wouldn’t be this problem and liberals could freely express what they really feel. But since the cultural mores change so slowly, and in some instances can be even set back (think of the strong backslash against feminism and liberalism in the recent years) liberals still need to maintain appearances.

But let us get back to Maria Ladenburger. Of course, with knowing this it is easy to understand why liberals are in fact happy about this murder (a white woman got what she deserved due to acts of her forefathers by an under-privileged minority) but less happy with it being talked about, given that such murders still provoke negative feelings in non-liberals, especially what we would call “The Normies” (more on that later).

This text isn’t really addressing liberals much. Liberals and myself agree with this murder. I will say once again liberals agree with and and are celebrating Maria Ladenburger’s murder.  To liberals the murder of Maria Ladenbuger is just oppressed people taking what belongs to them – and that is everything they ever wanted. Her life, your life and every life. If you don’t understand that you don’t understand basic facts about liberalism.  

But, who is unhappy with this murder? Well, I can roughly define two major groups of public that would be outraged by this murder.

First group are what is now referred to as “The Normies”, which would in sociopolitical context basically be people without too many strongly held or fringe views on things. And this would still include the majority of people on majority of things, from economics and crime to race or basically anything else. To an extent that they have any views their views are basically some kind of vanilla middle ground view of their current culture. So if you were to try and observe the views of such people on economy or governance in general they would likely resemble some kind of vague, vanilla social democracy. Don’t be fooled into thinking that these “Normies” are some kind of blank slates though – the views of these people in the West will likely be extremely slanted to the left. I wrote about this some time ago, basically trying to extrapolate why what is the current formal liberal teaching seemingly so close to what what would be seen as sane views of empathy, redemption or universalism – they still resemble a version of what in Christianity ! . Of course, current liberals no longer believe in this and have moved to much harsher racism/sexism against whites and males, but these “Normies” would basically be the people who still buy into the “Scripture”. So, these are the first kind of people to be outraged by this because they sort of function like machines and get off on keywords like “rape, murder, young girl”, despite not really having any kind of coherent, sensible ideology behind it.

The second group would be the right or alt-right. I am still differentiating between these groups and would normally never put them together but I will blend them this time due to what would, at least from my judgement, and I could be wrong, be the similar reactions on this. And these are predictable and really don’t need that many words – accusations against Islam and migrants.

And these accusations would be ok, if they weren’t missing the bigger point.

Back in January of 2016, after making a post suggesting that a Muslim takeover of Western Europe and the remaining sane Western Europeans living as dhimmis is the only sensible option remaining to possibly save civilization in it I was surprised at just how positive most of the reactions were, even from people who do have some stake in the current system remaining in one form or another, like married mothers of small children. The decay runs deep and many people are aware of this.

Yet, there were some in the alt-right who called me traitor and suggested I be hanged. This, obviously, is an alt-righter still interested in fixing the current Western culture.

So, where does this disagreement come from?

I’m going to be brave enough, no matter how much some members of the braindead army of total morons following me might use this to say “Yeah, you’re just angry because you can’t find a girlfriend!” (which is absolutely correct, you cannot find a girlfriend in the West and this makes me angry to no end), that the way you see the problem is mostly about how successful you are with women and what do you mean by success.  Of course, I am talking about those in the Alt-Right. Being a moron itself doesn’t guarantee you won’t be an incel anymore. The amount of morons is just too large for that. There are many, many incel morons of various stripes, from liberals who would die to enact the same policies that will make them single and childless for life, to lookists obsessed with facial ratios and believing that some magic number in that aspect will solve their problem.

If you are in the Alt-Right and you have a girlfriend or a wife then there is a fairly good chance you will believe there is something to fight for, despite the decay you’re seeing. This is pretty understandable and natural – even if you lack any friends or even people you like in the degenerate culture you will likely feel you have a stake in it if you have a romantic partner because there is a possibility that your genes might have a stake in it. Even if you don’t have kids now you might in the future, so again – your genes have a stake in it. So you will work to try and fix the sickness you see around you. Why do you think people like ramzpaul are against Muslims? They have kids and thus a stake in society.

On the other hand, even if you have some friends you find decent in the sick culture there will be little investment in it from you unless you have a partner.

These things are so obvious to any sane person that even 15 years ago writing about them would be completely unnecessary, to a point of explaining we sometimes have to eat and piss. Now they must be pointed out.

Who, then, is correct about their estimate? Those who want the West handed over to the Muslims (it is much better to use this expression than abolished or destroyed, given that most of the policies that made West powerful and successful are gone) or want it fixed?

Well, obviously this is not math or physics to have what would sometimes be a straightforward answer akin to “1 plus 1 equals 2¨. Embarrassingly enough, were some miracle to occur and and I could find a sane girlfriend/wife in the West it’s possible that my opinion could change from wanting the West handed over to Muslims to wanting it fixed. But, then again, even in such an unlikely scenario my opinion could once again change once I’d encounter the problems of raising my kids in what is surely to be an even more insane, wicked society than the one we have now or having other males pursue my wife.

So I will offer my opinion as somebody who believes West should just be given upon.

It is not a coincidence I offered a sort of brief story of my life and trauma I suffered up to February 2014 as pre-reading for interested readers. It describes various shenanigans done by women to me through some years (true hilarity being that my own “shenanigans” like, coercion and even attempting blackmail, were always amply awarded by women with their cunts, mouth and tongue while serious, fair and kind behavior never got me anywhere). Purely chronologically the post is a bit obsolete. I could add a lot more of female craziness and my own backslash to today’s situation. Since then I had a baby with a schizophrenic woman, a baby I’ve never seen and all this as a part of an arrangement, told my best female friend that I won’t accept her when she couldn’t go anywhere but stay at my place unless she fucks me, to which she consented and doesn’t have a problem with now,  and that’s just the things I can talk about – when it comes to most of it I unfortunately can’t.

And mind you, these are not women who are from places like Germany or France. They’re Central European in their mentality. They have more in common with Czech or Austrian women then either British or, for example, Russian women. Yet, their taste in men, their capability to maintain relationships, all of it was, is and always will be completely mangled.

Basically, in what is my opinion, and I stated as much in my last article on Trump, I believe modern Western women are not salvageable and that no superficial political changes will do much about this, as these will not have much influence on the way people will lead their day to day lives. Much like George W. Bush presidency didn’t improve the quality of modern American women I have no reason to believe that the Trump presidency will. Same for a place like UK – did the Conservative government in UK, which had been in power since 2010, make British women better? And examples like these are all over the rest of Europe where you have the so-called “conservative” or “right-wing” governments. Even in a place like Poland, which bans even abortion, you have Nixonian level riots by liberals and constant tension, with big cities like Warsaw swarmed by foreigners and women who are actually worse than even most American women in smaller cities (which is more of an indication of how bad these Polish women are than the quality of such American women).

The battle is lost. I don’t know what is there to explain anymore. Trump or any other political figure aren’t going to change female behavior because, at the end of the day, these women don’t give a fuck who is in charge of the country. For the kind of change some alt-right readers are suggesting Western political figures would have to have immense power that would affect even religious matters and implement this power in a way that would completely change the basic tenants of current Western societies and this will not happen

As much as I would like for many of these alt-right people to be right, I really don’t see how any kind of Western renaissance will happen in 2017 or basically in any year. Checked your Tinder or OKCupid accounts lately, gents? Are women saner and more civilized now because some orange idiot is in office?

When looking at some of these alt-right women, I rarely if ever see any ready to get married and squeeze out some kids. Most are just talk and not much else.

I know it would probably be easier for the kind of audience this blog had been attracting during the last year or two to play I’m very hopeful but it’s been years since I had the energy or patience for this. I am simply even more certain today than I ever was that Islam is our future. It is the only religion and an idea to combine such robustness with correct values and it is, unlike the hated altright, completely protected and held sacred by liberals.

With all this in mind, who was Maria Ladenburger? Well, her Wikipedia article says she was a German medical student who died when she was almost 20 and unmarried (search results on other sites say she was a daughter of some EU official but that is less important for the quantitative part).

So let us try to bring statistics into this equation. This amusing Durex study shows that she was likely not a virgin. These stats show that it was about 35 percent likely she would have a child out of wedlock in just 2014 (Table 3) and that her chances of being married at all were… well, getting slimmer every year, with a slight change upwards in 2014 (Table 1). That is if she would ever have kids – luckily, there’s Muslims. Now, we can speculate this or that on her personality. Obviously none of us knew her. But even using just some quickly found statistics one can easily see why Maria Ladenburger was, like most young Western European women, likely on her way to be a slut who was to be childless or have a child out of wedlock. And bear in mind, she was not even 20. All the indicators I outlined here will get worse, not better. As one character from a TV show I used to watch said “I know it’s tragic to think that way but you can’t argue with the fucking logic !” 

Qualitatively, things are a bit more tricky as they go into the emotional aspect which can’t be expressed with just numbers. But I’ll argue that they’re covered well enough. Most decent, moral men have their horror stories with women. Along with my February 2014 text, I highly recommend these stories written on CoAlpha forums in September 2015. One of the worst problems with anecdotal, qualitative evidence is that you can always find some moron whose stories with Western women were happy and most of our idiocratic society will find his story to be more uplifting and credible because the author is mainstream, even if it’s obvious by the way he acts later that his success was due to the fact that he was a massive asshole and as dumb as dirt. But, I won’t go into that any longer, seeing I already covered it and concluded that one must make their own conclusions on whether or not today’s Western women are worth it.

Maria Ladenburger was likely to become everything or at least most of things this blog is so vehemently against. Her parents’ money would likely ensure that she is protected from any consequences of her future shenanigans and that she is able to proceed with these on a high level. She was likely rotten even at the time of her death and even more likely to become rotten very soon. And she was, like current women in Trump’s USA, not to improve if some right wing party had won the elections. Had she lived, she would very likely be a source of trauma for every decent man in Germany (well, um, both of  them) who was unlucky enough to see potential for anything more serious than careless pump and dump in her. She would almost certainly be a pest, let us be honest, Westerners. She is the kind of girl who would reject you for treating her respectfully so you can be called an asshole and a “nice guy” by her brain-dead army of liberal virginal fanatics (whose ultimate prize isn’t pussy anyway but being loyal soldiers of their own tragedies) if you object in any way while the moron with an IQ of 20  fucking her somehow has “actual personality” – a stance these loyal liberals would hold as long as those being annoyed with Maria are members of the appropriate groups one is allowed to hate (you can usually tell them by the color of their skin and lack of gay mannerisms).

With its brain-dead youth, assholish majority of population and complete internalization of cancerous social policies like feminism West is dying old man. So Maria was a sad but a necessary victim of a situation where West has forfeited its reproductive, economic and every other future to a stronger group like Muslims.

On a lighter note…

The Trump thing

I’ve gotten a few questions asking me what I think about Donald Trump’s victory.

Since I do have an idea about  a good comparison of the whole situation with problems I am blogging about I will use this comparison later and that should be the most important part of this article.

But before I get on to that some introduction to my views about this entire thing, given that I didn’t write about US primaries or election at all. I will also say what I believe the future might be. I stress that this is not a general article about my views on America. Such an article is something that might appear one day but this isn’t it.

So, Trump has won and will be President. l I must say I was happy that night. Seeing the anger and despair of feminists and liberals, the worst scum to ever walk this planet, is something that will always make me happy. And this was their night of tears. It was, despite me not having any big emotional investment, one of the happiest and most exciting nights of my life. Suddenly, after 8 years liberals are suddenly where they were last in around 2004 – completely outside of any power, impotent and frustrated. I am sure that even just a day earlier they certainly had no inkling that they would find themselves in such a situation ! I am admittedly happy that Hillary lost. This candidate was supported by some of the worst and sickest animals in the world, supported by people who hate me and every other straight white male, who advocate killing of everybody white, even the smallest children. These monsters have now lost.

But what had been won?

Now, with some weeks gone, I am ready to offer up some objective analysis.

I find Trump to be amusing, in the lack of a better word.  To me, he seems to be some kind of a slimy mixture of Ronald McDonald and Foghorn Leghorn, and there is something eerily artificial about his hair and general appearance. I can also recognize some kind of a conman aura around him. Many of his business ventures, like “Trump University”, are obvious scams and most of his business successes were achieved by screwing-over  people. His vast support among Christians is also very much a joke.

But he is obviously not unintelligent, and can be quite articulate in some situations. However, you would not believe this from reading a transcript of one of his speeches, especially when the teleprompter is off. But in this Trump is merely adjusted to an average American, and it is virtually completely unimportant if it is planned or not. For Americans are the dumbest group of people in the world, virtual human garbage. Most posters I banned from this blog or some incel platforms I was in charge of were Americans who are simply too stupid to understand anything I said. I used to watch at disbelief at the things many of them said in trying to “debate” me in posts that called me out for my insults to Americans. They were too idiotic to see the glaring fallacies the very posts that were to tell me why Americans aren’t idiotic vermin contained. Their replies were something like “Don’t tell me Americans are this or that, you stupid fuck, fallacy 1, fallacy 2, fallacy 3, recycled fallacy 1, insanity, stupidity, stupidity, insanity….”. As usual, most of such imbeciles weren’t some anti-science fundamentalists, Christians or such types. They were smug liberal vermin that was so keen on insulting the groups I mentioned in the previous sentence, a prime example of what America is – a big Dunning-Krueger effect.

Of course, Americans aren’t the only morons in the world. Many other freaks from various parts of the world, usually liberals, don’t fall very much behind in terms of lack of reading comprehension and just pure insanity. But there is something specific about Americans that makes even the sanest alt-righters or/and anti-feminists often unable to grasp written text.

And this is the kind of audience Trump or basically any other candidate of any of the parties, even the small, insignificant outlier ones had to talk to. This fact must never be forgotten.Americans are human the scum of the Earth. Were the birthrates in the world somehow dwarfed enough an average IQ would go up several points every time an American dies. 

In many ways the current state of the America was reflected in the remaining candidates of this election cycle.

The left in 2016 election

Bernie Sanders was, in many ways, the worst candidate any of the parties had to offer this entire election, were we to look at it with a goal of keeping America alive ( a goal me and many of my readers don’t tend to share). So in a sense he was at the same time also the best candidate for somebody who wants America gutted as soon as possible. His idiotic plans would have added enormous debt and his general effect on the economy would be something akin to what I saw on Twitter under the title “What Bernie would do the US economy”, with a scene of Anthony Hopkins as Hannibal Lecter massacring that guard in “Silence of the Lambs”. It is, however, kind of a pointless endeavour to even debate what he’d do in the White House, given that not only would he be resisted at every point by a Republican Congress and Senate but also given the fact that he had no real chance of winning the primaries either.

The reason for his inability to win the primaries was that the DNC decided to prop up a weak, sickly and unpopular candidate like Hillary Clinton.

Notice how both Trump and Bernie had their own personal army of followers? Trumpets and Bernie Bros were all over the Internet. These candidates, like Obama (or even Ron Paul, for that matter !) in 2008 had their own stories, something that made their campaigns stand out, something that made their campaigns different than some regular boring campaign of a politician. Their fans would be popping out all over the social networks, their supporters would form up grassroots movements and these were really no ordinary campaigns.

But what did somebody like Hillary have? None of that !  She was immensely unpopular from the very beginning, burdened with multiple affairs and just seemed like somebody whose best days were behind her. I, for one, believe politics is often about luck, unforeseen circumstances and charismatic people that show up behind the corner, people you can’t really predict. During the last two decades in the West these appeared on the left more often than the right and prolonged its life when it objectively had very little to offer.  Bill Clinton, Tony Blair and Barack Obama were just that – charismatic people who were good at selling bullshit. In that aspect, Hillary was quite unlucky to run into Obama during the 2008 election, when she appeared younger and less hated.

During the last month or so of Hillary’s campaign all her pathetic misguided strategy came to light. She danced around with Beyonce and such individuals, all of whom have nothing to do with common Americans, while completely neglecting the heartland of the country. But what could she offer anyway? The entire Democratic Party is a party of corrupt, disgusting elitists far removed from workers and the common folk. Fuck, it was her husband that finished off the Rust Belt after Reagan already bloodily wounded it. But the even more important reason was that she simply didn’t give a fuck. Her campaign was the most progressive one in history, going completely left, partially due to influence of Bernie Sanders, by the end turning into one huge tranny-gay fest, all peppered with Hollywood left.

What must also be mentioned is the feminism of the both candidates. Bernie Sanders is at least honest in his feminism. He is an old fool who had believed all these horrible things for decades, even when they were not very popular. That is in its own way commendable, though many of his beliefs are awful. Hillary, on the other hand, is much more disgusting. The ferocity with which she persecuted Bill Clinton’s victims in the 90s, compared to her current feminist views, just like her changes of mind on things like gay marriage, are all indicators of massive, disgusting snake (not that Trump was much better in his statements through the years but he never had the power to inflict such damage).

The right in  2016 election

When Republican primaries took off in 2015 it all seemed so familiar to 2011-  a clown cart with 20 candidates, debates which even had two sections this time (for candidates above a certain number in the polls and those below – remember Rick Santorum?) and loads of crazy.

I won’t go into what happened beyond but will say that I still believe Ted Cruz, for all his awkwardness and some cuckishness he exhibited later, was still the best of the remaining four candidates in the race in May 2016. I think he was honestly on the side of the average working American, or at least that this is something he believed in. But it didn’t happen. Americans, as they always do, had to choose a worse candidate.

General election

If you read this post up to know you probably understand I found both candidates pretty pathetic and didn’t care much about either one. While I believed that Hillary was more capable there were many reasons to be against her. As somebody opposed to women’s suffrage and any kind of political rights for women I thought that having a female president, even in this late stage of the US, would be a disaster. Some of the reasons related to gender were explained well by Roosh here, especially the part that said….

Obama was the “race” president, and look how badly he has damaged race relations in only eight years. Hillary will be the “gender” president. The future we have in store should be absolutely clear to you if she happens to defeat Trump….Not only will she move to establish a techno-matriarchy where men are second-class citizens to any female, but she will ensure that no movement or organization will be able to challenge her or her establishment cronies ever again. This isn’t a trivial matter of getting banned from a web site like Twitter or Youtube—many of you will be forced to escape the country for no other reason than you happening to be a man who found himself on the wrong side of the establishment.

Yes, another 4-8 years of Democrats was an extremely bad idea. It would be giving more power to the SJW vermin and other ruinous forces. And while I didn’t like Trump much I liked the idea of the neoreactionary movement being emboldened by his victory.

Another extremely important reason for me preferring Trump’s victory was to give white people breathing space. America is an insane country. It cannot stand and should not stand. There are countries in Europe that led many wars between themselves whose citizens hate each other much less than Americans hate each other. What do East coast feminazi cunt writers or New York hipster libtards have to do with white conservatives in, say , Kansas? What do ghetto blacks have to do with Charleston high classes? Not much but mutual hatred is what binds many of the groups in America, hatred based on various racial and, much more crucially, ideological differences.  In December 2014 I already outlined what the goal of whites in America should be. I still hope this will come to fruition soon.

And while I’ll give bonus points to those who recognize that animals like BLM Movement were never used as Hillary’s personal army, unlike sort of personal armies of fans Trump and Bernie had,  the sympathy Bernie/Hillary had towards these beasts was still very worrying.

Still, wishing was one thing and reality seemed to be something completely different. In what was likely the most epic flop of a number of institutions dealing in polls/predictions in history all of us were bombarded by predictions that Hillary was sure to win. It seemed that way to me as well. Just look at it from a historical point of view – Democrats won 5 of 6 elections before 2016 in terms of popular vote (make that 6 of out of 7 now that we count the 2016). Republicans won the 2000 election by the skin of their nuts and 2004 election was won in specific circumstances of 2003-2004 America and the atmosphere of war the country was in at the time (of course, the atmosphere before the 2008 election was also specific in its own sort of way but I won’t go into that here). And while Republicans won a solid victory in 2010 it obviously didn’t manage to translate into the next presidential election. With House/Senate elections not being a good predictor of presidential ones it could be said that, despite another victory Republicans obtained in 2014, around 2013-2015 it was a completely reasonable question to ask yourself if there will ever be a Republican president again.  Few, if any, like the always brilliant Ryan Faulk, dared suggest a possible Trump victory by seeing encouraging signs from the primaries, like people not usually voting in Republican primaries voting for Trump (something that was also the case for Obama in Democratic primaries, especially in 2008).. As I mentioned previously, even something like big crowds or support on social media didn’t seem to amount to much – Ron Paul had these  Thus was my shock and satisfaction even greater.

The future

It is a fantasy to believe that Trump’s presidency will change much. As had been previously explained, America had pretty much for all intents and purposes died by 1920 and the disastrous decision of the 19th Amendment, though some opinions place the beginning of the end even earlier, in 1800s. So in this aspect, which is a crucial one, America will not return to sanity. Trump won’t abolish women’s suffrage, he won’t bring women back into kitchens, none of this will happen. Did the Bush presidency restore the value of American women? Did the Reagan presidency stabilize what was a rapidly plummeting value of American women in the 80s (of course, with certain noble exceptions of women in backwoods areas, exceptions which still exist today) ? No, the battle is lost. The best aspect in terms of women will be, as Roosh says, to make it easier to find a fellow traveler. But even there you need to be careful which traveler to choose.

In terms of feminism, SJWs, alt-right etc, all of these things are kinda irrelevant ultimately if you look at the paragraph above, which outlines the real crux of the issue. Without abolishing women’s suffrage, without a hasty return to strict patriarchy, nothing of real relevance will happen. And we know Trump could never do that.

Economically, things are a bit more complex. Protectionism is an obsolete tactic in 21st century. American industry and manufacturing are irreversibly damaged and the current economy is basically the 90s “bubble-gum economy” minus the rosy glasses and delusion. What good is the service sector when there will be less and less to service? Once America abolished the two things that made the US economy boom, which were extremely high tariffs and extremely free markets within the country, it has essentially removed what made it exceptional and turned towards being ordinary. Add masses of third world immigrants to that and you get what is quickly heading towards a third world country. We’ll see what Trump can do on the immigrants themselves but it is unlikely he’ll be able to restore the already destroyed manufacturing.

On the other hand, America does have some natural resources. The problem with this, however, that it is geographically sort of on the periphery of the world. And with what is still a much smaller area and more urbanized area than Russia, along with environmental protection standards that Trump will be unlikely to really repeal and a population of what are basically more and more utter morons I doubt this could in any way change the future of the county in any significant way.

How will the actual presidency look like? It is extremely hard to predict, but a cynic in me would say that it will be a de facto Mike Pence presidency with typical Republican policies (not that this is always a bad thing in degenerate America) while an aging Trump will get a chance to now fool around on the highest level.

I will finish with a following comparison.

I have watched the incel communities devolve from communities of mature, intelligent people whose good qualities are exactly what’s unattractive to scum like modern Western women to weird, exclusive communities rejecting “normies” and making bizarre suggestions about dealing with incel which would could never come true (unlike the suggestions sane reactionary men make, which are basically steps that worked in every successful society). But aren’t such developments in fact just what Trump is on a greater scale? These incels have never been given any hope or a way out. 

Instead they’ve been told they’re lazy and “entitled” for some of them even pointing out that working while being unable to attract a woman is pointless, even though most of them are still working.

They’ve been lied to that modern Western women want consideration, humane treatment and respect, which doomed many of them at a crucial young age. They’ve been lied to and told not to rape and abuse them, and what did they get for this? Hatred and derision by these rape loving sluts who instead adored their abusers and rapists. They were told not to kill women – but women kissed those who killed other women like gods. 

They’ve been told that they’re “mentally ill” (and the term, which can cover everything from anxiety to other problems that don’t effect ones rational mind, was used here as if the “progressive”, “smart” liberals saying this are 17th century shepherds)  for having the most natural reaction in the world – that of dissatisfaction to being denied natural needs like romantic love, companionship and sex. Yet, the same crazies who told them to just ignore these things as if they were a lack of green socks were called normal. 

They’ve had all of the articles covering this problem back when Wikipedia was still a sane, non- leftist site, deleted for no real reasons. They had their places for gathering online like subreddits mercilessly removed after pressure from crazy liberals. 

And, yes, they’ve also been given good advice as well. Advice on how to escape the sick West and it’s mentally ill population, it’s rape worshiping women, its sickening double standards and lack of intellectualism. But guess what? The population, including incels, is getting dumber. Things people like me write about are complicated and require a lot of historical knowledge and abstract thinking. They require you to not be brainwashed, among other things. And, in the end, not everybody can just gather enough money to leave for non-feminist places. Some people, like myself, are already physically ill and weak, some burdened with extreme depression, some unskilled for the kind of jobs that would get them that kind of money. And just going abroad is difficult. It is risky. Places like SE Asia, South America or former-Soviet countries are full of threats and people willing to use you or rob you, just like they’re full of non-feminist women.

Doesn’t something like the craziness of current incel communities look eerily similar to simplicity and silliness of what Trump is proposing? 

Aren’t people like heartless airheads giving impossible advice like “give up on women” kinda like brain-dead Hillary voters? Aren’t their sick non-solutions full of hot air and smugness kinda like what Hillary’s Beyonce campaign was?

Couldn’t those poor incels who can’t just leave the sick West be compared to rural whites who faced complete dispossession and couldn’t just leave America, aren’t young enough or smart enough to find jobs in high tech industries, can’t just start making money essentially doing nothing but writing shitty hateful articles like dirty feminist cunts from the Eastern coast (think Amanda Marcotte or somebody like that)? 

Aren’t those incels who think of more and more extreme ideas just reacting to their merciless persecution by animals in forms on humans who hate them simply because they’re white and want to procreate, much like the alt-right reacts to attacks against themselves on Twitter or Facebook?

Aren’t people like fschmidt, giving you advice that includes radical changes in your life and possibly even changing a country, somewhat like what Ron Paul was in 2008/2012? People who are deep down right but most can’t accept their message because they’re too stuck to their way of life, their country (in the case of incels who are afraid to travel) or the country they know (in the case of people afraid of Ron Paul’s America)? 

And, finally, aren’t all of these problems, both of America or incels, or liberals or whoever else, just a symptom of a larger problem this society has? A problem caused by the fact that feminism should have never ever happened, that it should have been obliterated to pieces and every attempt of it destroyed back in the 19th century?   Please, read

and read it well. Get educated. 

So what did most incels choose? Insanity, in the form of their own Trumpism. And given their own circumstances, who could really blame them?

Bring on the insanity.

Various definitions/types of rape

The word rape has various meanings today. Some, like the one which will be about its sane legal definition, are sadly mostly historical in current Western culture, though they still subsist in some saner cultures even today. So what are these definitions?

Sane definition of the act of rape – This definition is also consistent with Common Law (“Carnal knowledge of a woman forcibly and against her will”) and even with evolutionary psychology (“Human copulation resisted by the victim to the best of her ability unless such resistance would probably result in death or serious injury to her or others she commonly protects” is the definition used by Thornhill & Palmer in A Natural History of Rape).

So rape can only be performed by a penis and of course women can’t rape men.

Sane legal definition of rape – Sane legal systems differentiate between act of rape and a crime of rape. A sane legal definition of rape doesn’t believe all acts of rape are crimes of rape. What nonsense would it be to believe that and to treat the whims of some sluts as actually defacing a virgin or a married woman !

A sane legal definition of rape would define rape as a property crime against the woman’s father or husband. Also, rapes against prostitutes should be prosecuted. But it would certainly never account for rapes of sluts, and would consider raping a slut a justified response that should be praised, not persecuted.

Current insane definition of the act/crime of rape – I am saying act/crime of rape because insane modern Western cultures basically don’t differentiate between the act of rape and a crime of rape. In any case, this definition had been, especially since 2000, expanded to include much more than just the actual act of rape. It now includes any form of coercion, inserting objects into sexual orifices, even the insane claim that a woman can rape a male ! There are feminists/liberals insane enough to believe Brock Turner raped some unconscious woman he fingered or that I raped a woman who offered my sex herself in a phone call, simply because I put her picture on my blog when she decided to torture me (as she later admitted herself).

An actual moral definition of rape used by feminists/liberals – this is what almost all feminists and liberals actually see as rape. It is defined as any act a straight white male does to get sex. Asking a woman out by a straight white male is rape to liberals. Going on a date if you’re a straight white male is rape. On the other hand, no actual act of rape, even rape of smallest children, is rape if it is done by Sacred Classes like blacks, Muslims or Hispanics.

I will admit that there are some feminists and liberals who don’t believe so, but these mostly stop calling themselves feminists or liberals once they realize what these ideologies are about.

It is also true that this definition isn’t yet widely used in law but police officers and judges who don’t use this definition are seen as vermin by liberals and there are places in the West where it’s slowly getting there .

Female definition of rape– Women simply define rape as sex they regret, and pay basically no intention to any other circumstances, including physical pain. So this definition is completely silly and shouldn’t be regarded by anybody sane as anything more than what 5 year-old children think. That some legal systems are starting to bring this definition into equation (though usually by ignoring the sex with a member of Sacred classes females regret) is simply a symptom of a decaying society.

I support the islamization of Europe

Necessary reading to understand this post better:

Study: Women Are More Xenophilic Than Men

The story of your incel



I remember a very interesting feeling I had in my childhood.

Amazingly, I was too young to really experience the war in my own country, being six years old when it ended, and at the same time old enough to, unlike somebody born in, say, mid 90s, remember a period called Pax Americana. It seemed I was born to live in a period of eternal peace. I remember the feeling of relief in my country once the war ended, the idea that we are now in peace just like the so-called civilized Europe. War seemed to be a thing of the past.

I have this vivid memory of watching US and British air force doing some limited bombing of Baghdad facilities in late 1998 on CNN. I remember staring at the images of a blacked-out city filmed from above and hoping to see some explosion, anything, thinking “Is this what would be at least some kind of war?” But all I did see was a boring frame of a blacked-out Baghdad. For 90s were a golden age of action films. I’d see shooting everywhere in fiction, yet there was no war in real life and it looked like there will never be again. It really did seem war itself was coming to an end and I yearned for some action. Yet it seemed the only place I’ll ever see it would be movies.

Yes, during those years actual war was really seen by me and many others as something exotic that will never ever happen again. Sure, now and then some embassy would be bombed, some hostages taken somewhere in the world and Bill Clinton would wage some bullshit Monica’s wars but it all seemed like a relaxing hunt after a successful end to a war. Yeltsin was a funny drunk, Russia on its knees, China known by its cheap low quality plastic products. Everything seemed like America won the game called The World.

America itself was already really disgusting internally – fat, stupid, ignorant, self-satisfied, narrow minded, full of retarded skaters, sorority sluts and other monstrosities, all the things that started in at least early 80s and in fact much before (all of it stemming from the most disastrous decision in the history of the country, a decision that doomed every society that made it, 19th Amendment). Cops were already extremely heavy handed, insane laws supported by a majority of utterly delusional population unworthy of life there. (What should also be mentioned is that it had been already internally weak by deindustrialization done in the 80s, which resulted in the bubblegum economy of the 90s).

Yet, there wasn’t this atmosphere of fear.

All of this came to and end on September 11, 2001. In one day the face of America had been changed forever. All the nasty traits and the utter stupidity Americans already exhibited now came out in full force, compounded by paranoia.


What changed after September 11 was also my idea that war is gone. Pax Americana, that seemed so natural when you’re basically born into it, was now beginning to fade. Though the invasion of Afghanistan was a relatively small scale operation what followed in March 2003 opened an entirely new can of worms.

While American military might kept the fighting contained to the countries it invaded once this army left Iraq it could no longer contain the consequences of what it did. At around the same time,  Libya, a stable country in the Mediterranean was also destroyed for profits.

By 2014, with the occurrence of ISIS, despite this group being somewhat overblown in terms of its strength due to its skills in marketing, it was obvious that the mess America created was out of hand. Also, in 2014 Russia stepped out into the big scene again, doing an unprecedented thing in Europe since 1945 by taking a part of another country’s territory and reigniting what is basically a new Cold War. All of these are obvious signs of America steeply declining.

Influx of refugees into Europe is a big topic these last months. The only frustration I feel about this is when watching the silly, misguided reactions of Neoreactionary movement.

I am simply amazed at the idea that most of those seemingly intelligent, rational people can be stupid enough to believe Islam is what is the problem.

But, let’s take one thing at a time. In order to understand why this is so one needs to explain some basic facts about Muslims and women.

Islam is a powerful, popular religion that never had all the four necessary prerequisites (those being monogamy, female premarital chastity, good religion and widely available prostitution). It had some of those, but not all, and could thus never achieve the kind of creativity and success most successful coalpha societies like Athens did.

There were two really successful Muslim empires, Ummayad/Abbasid Caliphates and Ottoman Empire. They both did very well at the time, and in terms of size basically equaled coalpha societies like Roman Republic or even 1500-1800 England and eclipsed those like Athens. In some aspects it could be said that scientific achievements of Abbasid Caliphate even eclipsed those of Roman Republic and Roman Empire, which is not surprising considering the militant nature of the former and the increasingly degenerate nature of the latter. It is interesting that Abbasid Caliphate did suffer from liberalism during its heyday, even having female judges. Ottoman Empire was a tough, strong state in its heyday but also didn’t reach the greatest heights a society is able to potentially reach.

Muslims and Arabs aren’t some stupid, uneducated brutes some of the alt right likes the present them. I am sure some of the liberals reading my blog believed I thought so as well. They are, as always, wrong. Muslims knew how to create strong, prosperous and civilized societies.

However, due to them not being coalpha societies their decline wasn’t exactly due to liberalism.

It is difficult to determine the causes of Abbasid decline but it seems they have a lot to do with foreign invasions by Crusaders and Mongols. I really don’t know enough about the changes within the Caliphate itself but what is noticeable is that there was significant fragmentation since 11th century, in  fact starting in as early as 8th century with an Ummayad descendant founding a dynasty in Spain. By the time of the first Crusader invasion there was already very severe fragmentation – for example, Jerusalem had been taken by one Arab faction in 1098, just one year before it fell to the Crusaders !

Yet, the area of former Caliphate found often found new lifelines in less civilized but strong and vital tribes like Seljuks and Ottomans.

The decline of Ottoman Empire is something I am somewhat more familiar. I found (though I am no expert) no significant liberal influences until way after the decline already started. So far I am chalking it up to technology and poorer organization after 18th century. when compared to Western nations. After all, it is Protestantism that I found to be that great change that moved the world forward and even the Catholic Habsburg Monarchy was much influenced by German Protestantism. Still, even up to its final dissolution after World War I Ottoman Empire was a so-so place to live.

Even after colonization of much of the Middle East, including the relatively short term colonization of parts of defunct Ottoman Empire, Arab countries like Syria, Libya or Iraq weren’t doing that badly, though they were obviously quite dysfunctional. All of this changed in March 2003, when Americans made the fatal first step towards destroying the stability of the region.

And this is where we could stop on this issue. All else is pretty much widely known.

Now we shall come to the West.

Western countries that won WW2 were still healthy, self confident societies. In fact, had the fertility rate of that period continued the numbers of population would be  several times higher today. In 1945, Hitler’s defeat didn’t seem like a tragedy it turns out to be today.

West continued a healthy does of self-confidence all throughout the Cold War period. And then, for a while, it really seemed to have won. The trashing America gave to Iraq in 1991 was the pinnacle of its military supremacy, all while the USSR was collapsing. Get used to Anglo-American supremacy for a long, long time, screamed many of the headlines at the time.

However, this was not to be. It turned out to be a short glimpse of eternal success, as the fatal disease had already been sown.

Year after year even since the 90s West had been in constant decline due to feminism and liberalism. Decent men could no longer find wives, women became degenerate sluts always looking for the next dirtbag to fuck.

Now let me talk about women. Women always want to mate with men who are most reproductively successful. In current Western societies it is retarded, irresponsible dirtbags who can create many more kids than what are actual alphas like leaders. How many kids do famous actors or sportsmen have? Quite often more than average, but a typical scumbag makes that many in an year.

This is why fatherhood and taking care of the kid by a male partner are now separate things – women are virtually outsourcing biological fatherhood in order to increase their chances of having sons with more chance of reproducing. 

And this isn’t because these women are inherently evil or anything like that. They’re just taking care of their best reproductive interests. If burn victims in wheelchairs were currently most successful they’d have their offspring. They don’t care. What matters are the results.

Modern Western men are either retarded thugs or completely degenerate pussified weaklings who are usually completely incel,

These women want no consent, respect, or any basic consideration. To them, men who show even the slightest hint of intelligence and morality are utter scum. They want to be crushed like old beer cans. They spend their days spreading their legs to the lowest of the low. And this is no wonder, since their local men who aren’t retarded thugs are degenerate morons.

I met Germans. Even a successful, handsome and wealthy ones like Takis Würger are in fact degenerate, simple minded morons doing corny pieces designed for the lowest common denominator – this denominator being 99 percent of population. And if you don’t have his status but have his beliefs you get left with a load of nothing. Imagine German kids. Fat, rude, degenerate and, most importantly, going away.  Germany now has the lowest birth rate in the world, surpassing even Japan despite the fact it’s men basically went to shit and gave up on women. Germany is dying. A nation that gave more more talented people than any other in the history of the world, from composers to scientists, soldiers, actors and politicians, a country that in fact most Americans came from to US, is now a nation of degenerate fools.That old barren hag Merkel, who will never have to worry about her own kids cares little for any of this.

(a good comparison to solidify my point were contacts with Arabs I used to have while working with foreign customers – they were all extremely polite and much saner than any Western idiot)

For some bizarre reason most of the alt right doesn’t really acknowledge this basic fact about Western women, which stays contained on incel blogs and forums.

But once you are aware of this fact you can see that Muslims arriving in the West is an extremely good thing.

Current culture of places like Iraq or Syria is a pretty dysfunctional but vastly superior to those of Western thugs, whose culture in fact doesn’t even exist and consists of loitering and burping.  And those thugs are the fathers of current children in the West.

Muslims are different and now they’re luckily brought here to fertilize Western women.

  • Muslims have many kids, but Muslims tend to take care of their kids. Western thugs couldn’t care less about taking care of any kids and simply leave the care of the kids to cucks or the state. All the while decent men are rejected by fertile women.
  • Muslims crack down on sluts. Western sluts are why Western thugs even procreate.
  • Muslims usually make women dependent on husbands and don’t take away money from decent men to fund sluts.

What mustn’t be forgotten in this whole situation is that Muslims are one of the sacred classes liberals have. Like blacks or other minorities, in the eyes of the liberal a Muslim is a sacred creature that can do no wrong.

I will examine some of the alternatives, but they seem bleak as hell, since

  • As I stated previously, modern Christian women, while being much less worse than modern Western sluts, have several significant problems. They are focusing their religion around the worship of an nonexistent being and following the cooky expectation of male premarital chastity, which is sickening nonsense. And that is if they eventually don’t turn into…
  • This
  • Alternative right/neoreactionary/Dark Enlightenment movements are scattered and unable to change any policies. Any such attempts are bound to fail with 100 percent probability.
  • If you can’t change the dominant culture you can’t change women.

So, what are these anti-feminists, neoreactionaries and others doing by reacting so violently against Muslims? It is really baffling. I am trying to wrap my head around anybody who could think in such a way. Maybe some of you are just senile or haven’t seen the basic demographic data? Or maybe you’re unaware of the trends within the government?

All the ideological trends are going in a horrible direction. There is no future for the West. When you destroyed the social policies that made the West exceptionally wealthy, which had to do with monogamy, patriarchy and solid religion, you destroyed the West. When you empower sluts and destroy fathers you are applying the exact opposite of the formula that made West great before. That’s what’s made the West great, and it is now destroyed.

It is tempting to joke and call these anti-immigration idiots governments ops, SPLC employees or just data phobic. It would almost be comforting, since I am talking about people young enough not to have some kind of a brain degeneration. Sadly, they’re none of that. They’re just stupid.  I mean,I am talking about people who are not liberals. These are idiots who somehow want to push Muslims back to continue the cesspool that is the current West. But how many of them are actually against women’s suffrage or return of the patriarchal European values? What do they think would happen even if Muslims were to leave? Nothing, West would revert to state it was in  10,000 BC before the end of the century.

Women subconsciously know this and want to be bred by strong men like Muslims. Who would want a pussified Western idiot?

The entire nature of the bullshit white men are taught today makes them inadequate, as it goes against female nature.

Does consent exist in nature?


So who thinks about consent?

Losers think about consent.

Can women be fully lesbian?

No, they can’t.

So why do some women turn fully lesbian?

Because they’re disgusted by men.

Does contraception exist in nature?


So who uses contraception?

Losers use contraception.

(what must be remembered is that consent, contraception etc are useful and necessary, but in civilized societies where they are appreciated – these societies are now sadly largely lacking)

You’ll rarely see blacks, Muslims or such groups do any of this. Yet nobody’s accusing them of anything.

Men who are not inadequate do what they want with women and colonize them with pregnancies. Yet the society teaches men not to do that.
Inadequacy comes from applying the standards that go against human nature.

I just don’t see how can anybody with any glimmer of sanity oppose Muslims destroying the evil Western cultures corrupted by feminism.

What needs to happen is that Muslims need to destroy the evil Western society.  A society in which for example, you can’t even legally test your paternity in France. They should be welcomed with open arms by all ideologically aware people. The inevitable massacre of liberals by Muslims they worshiped like gods will probably be the most glorious event in the history of the world.

Men who can’t join an alternative group like Mikraite should at least expect to become dhimmis in a somewhat reasonable Muslim society. Extremists like ISIL won’t occupy the West since they’re militarily defeated. Demographics will, and, as I thoroughly explained here, Muslims can create solid societies.

Liberals have first enforced policies that made decent men incapable of having kids and decided they want no kids themselves. Muslim women bear many  Muslim children and now will many of the European women. History belongs to those who show up. It will be a far cry from what the West was when it was sane but much less dysfunctional than current West, a society demented and cruel enough to do what even ISIL would never even thought of – take away any ability for decent men to have any chance of having a partner and expect them to slave away for thugs and sluts. In feminist society a decent man can’t get anything. He will be tossed aside for any rapist. In a  Muslim society as a dhimmi or a convert you will have a wife and children. In the end, that’s what really matters. Even more than pork or beer.

Muslims must breed many European women and leave some to sane dhimmis who want to at live in at least some kind of a civilization. Everything else is a path to total destruction.

The West is dead. Refugees, welcome !


The party is over

I recently got an e-mail with several very detailed questions about my behavior on dates. Each question contained several shorter sub-questions. They asked if I am doing this or that on date, listing various behaviors stereotypically considered unattractive, which meant that not all of them were actually that to vermin like modern Western women. So these questions were an odd mixture of what is considered rude and obnoxious (and thus is actually attractive) and what actually is unattractive, all obviously put in the context of them being unattractive. This meant that the person asking them was quite, as they might say, Blue Pilled, but the tone itself was quite cordial so my reply was something like the following…

  • I don’t think all of the behaviors listed are unattractive
  • I used to do some of this but…
  • And this is what matters, it no longer actually matters I’ve stopped going on dates in about December 2013, going on what could possibly be considered one more in spring 2014. Heck, there was even a post about me saying I’m giving up women or something (which didn’t exactly happen the way I imagined at the time) during that time.
  • The reason I stopped on going dates is that I came to realize that they were a waste of time with my current approach. I no longer looked for any dates,

What happened later, after spring 2014? Well, basically, during the summer and autumn of 2014 I had what I now call The Awakening. Now that I finally had some free time some free time to stop and observe the world more I realized some very unpleasant truths about modern Western women. Some would include that

  • Their nature is so fickle and potentially vicious that they can be only be good under tight control in a patriarchal society.
  • That modern Western women are thus mostly completely incapable of relationships.
  • That modern Western like abuse and rape (I’ve since realized that they like much worse, like being shot and decapitated – even if the victims themselves will die other women will like it, and so will the shooting victim if she survives). They want to be squashed like bugs.

Nowadays I always laugh at those people who still call me “clingy” or whatever. Umm, have any of you idiots seen this article and the way I show how I treated cunts who messaged me there?

Yes, The Awakening is why I, for example, why I made such a sudden U-turn with somebody like JesslynNicole, regardless of whether she was genuine or not. In the past I’d actually want to meet these cunts. Now I knew the truth – that they were attention seeking rape worshiping scum. Hell, one of them even bore a rapist’s child.

But what was I to do next? I was never about to make peace with any of this.

My initial idea was to go on dates and use completely different tactics to the one I used previously, now employing psychological and even physical violence (up to a point of breaking women’s legs).

But after doing something else in late December – early January I dropped the dates idea completely.

See, after hanging out with my former friend-with-benefits during that time something just dawned on me.

I remembered how me and this girl met. I met her in 2013, the year when I made an ill-fated and senseless push into over 50 dates, trying to find a girlfriend due to not knowing what I know now.

I didn’t treat her any differently than I treated any of the other trash I met there yet in her case I had no problem sleeping with her on our third “date” (which was more of our third meeting, since the “date” consisted of meeting up and going to what was then my place). And it might have happened even sooner.

This was because this women was, which I didn’t know at the time but knew by then, a schizophrenic.

This was why she, ironically, was basically unable to contract the usual feminist disease of being disgusted by decent men. She still had all the other symptoms of the decline –  was stupid, a huge slut and completely divorced from reality, yet all those other girls usually had all these symptoms and found me unattractive. She didn’t.

Meeting her again after an year and a half made me remember her more starkly and consider all of this in a new light.

I was a loser for even going on dates. 

I have forgotten the old truth Cornfed stated in 2012

Western females are just public urinals being used by different dirtbags. The idea that it is possible to form a relationship with them is ridiculous. Similarly, dating is a thing of the past. This is because Western females are all sluts trying to increase their slut status among other sluts. Therefore they want to be f***ed by high status men. It follows that perceived high status men will have sluts constantly throwing themselves at them, so they won’t have to date to get sex – they can just take their chosen slut home or to a convenient location to f**k right away. Hence it follows that if you are asking for a date with a female then you are not of high status, so as far as the female is concerned you are a loser she wouldn’t want to date. The slutification of females has rendered dating obsolete as a cultural construct. The only way to score Western sluts is if you get across the message that your only interest in them is to perform the most degrading sex acts you can think of on them before severing all contact and that you don’t really care if they don’t want to because you can easily find some other slut who will.

So I dropped the dates idea and tried doing something else.

The actual specifics cannot really be mentioned (it will be obvious why when I do my post on some of the methods) but it has to do with many of the things my haters accused me of. I did all this and more. Every day was a new experience, a new challenge to see just how much modern Western sluts, these beings completely mad due abolishment of male authority over them, completely incapable of standing even the slightest sign of respect and politeness, could take. Of course, the answer (as was already known by my experiences with women even before that, experiences which I failed to grasp accurately up to that point) was – just about anything. Any indecency and barbarism was bearable to these animals.

The party was finally and thoroughly over and it won’t ever be repeated.

All of my life I was lied to about relationships, never being told that healthy relationships can only occur in a patriarchal society. I was told to date virtual sperm tankers with no lock on the tank door and so I suffered.

No more.

Right now my idea of a “girlfriend” in the West would be constant beatings and rapes, with no sort of other activity or even basic communication.  I’d virtually urinate and defecate on this slut. And I’d be liked for this. 

Right now I am even considering dates again, but, knowing what I know now, just to blow off some steam on a slut without any sexual connotations (since I now know they’d be rendered impossible by the fact we even went on a date), simply to hurt what I hate.

Right now I am aware that non-consensual sex is actually morally better in  modern Western society, as being able to procure consensual sex virtually guarantees you being a monster.

Simply put, the gig is up.

Modern Western women no longer want any respect, consent or to be treated as anything than dogshit.

Please, stop taking any of their “will” into consideration. They are just sperm tankers with no locks on the tank door.

If you believe you can have a “relationship” with them you will suffer and deservedly so.

It is time for intelligent men of the West to see them for what they are and to have no business with them, using only prostitutes, until they can leave the West. Or, should they be forced to stay in the West, to treat them as savagely as they can. In no way should you see them as anything resembling equal human beings.  Everything else will make them hate you.

I am in no way advocating the unnatural, crazy ideas of the current mainstream MGTOW movement. In no way should you give up on women the way these losers want you to.

My proposal is different.

Their “rejection”, “consent”, “will” or other nonsensical, outdated concepts should mean nothing to you – they are gone, lost, no longer applicable. Don’t even ask. Using concepts like female will is obsolete. You cannot be rejected and you should not be wanted. You should just use the women as a public good, similarly as water.  You can no longer allow yourself to think in a manner of what a woman “wants”. She is not supposed to want or not want you. 

Sane young men must know what the rules of the game are now, thanks to feminism, which devoured women’s minds and turned them into mush.

The party is truly and well over.