Various definitions/types of rape

The word rape has various meanings today. Some, like the one which will be about its sane legal definition, are sadly mostly historical in current Western culture, though they still subsist in some saner cultures even today. So what are these definitions?

Sane definition of the act of rape – This definition is also consistent with Common Law (“Carnal knowledge of a woman forcibly and against her will”) and even with evolutionary psychology (“Human copulation resisted by the victim to the best of her ability unless such resistance would probably result in death or serious injury to her or others she commonly protects” is the definition used by Thornhill & Palmer in A Natural History of Rape).

So rape can only be performed by a penis and of course women can’t rape men.

Sane legal definition of rape – Sane legal systems differentiate between act of rape and a crime of rape. A sane legal definition of rape doesn’t believe all acts of rape are crimes of rape. What nonsense would it be to believe that and to treat the whims of some sluts as actually defacing a virgin or a married woman !

A sane legal definition of rape would define rape as a property crime against the woman’s father or husband. Also, rapes against prostitutes should be prosecuted. But it would certainly never account for rapes of sluts, and would consider raping a slut a justified response that should be praised, not persecuted.

Current insane definition of the act/crime of rape – I am saying act/crime of rape because insane modern Western cultures basically don’t differentiate between the act of rape and a crime of rape. In any case, this definition had been, especially since 2000, expanded to include much more than just the actual act of rape. It now includes any form of coercion, inserting objects into sexual orifices, even the insane claim that a woman can rape a male ! There are feminists/liberals insane enough to believe Brock Turner raped some unconscious woman he fingered or that I raped a woman who offered my sex herself in a phone call, simply because I put her picture on my blog when she decided to torture me (as she later admitted herself).

An actual moral definition of rape used by feminists/liberals – this is what almost all feminists and liberals actually see as rape. It is defined as any act a straight white male does to get sex. Asking a woman out by a straight white male is rape to liberals. Going on a date if you’re a straight white male is rape. On the other hand, no actual act of rape, even rape of smallest children, is rape if it is done by Sacred Classes like blacks, Muslims or Hispanics.

I will admit that there are some feminists and liberals who don’t believe so, but these mostly stop calling themselves feminists or liberals once they realize what these ideologies are about.

It is also true that this definition isn’t yet widely used in law but police officers and judges who don’t use this definition are seen as vermin by liberals and there are places in the West where it’s slowly getting there .

Female definition of rape– Women simply define rape as sex they regret, and pay basically no intention to any other circumstances, including physical pain. So this definition is completely silly and shouldn’t be regarded by anybody sane as anything more than what 5 year-old children think. That some legal systems are starting to bring this definition into equation (though usually by ignoring the sex with a member of Sacred classes females regret) is simply a symptom of a decaying society.

14 thoughts on “Various definitions/types of rape

  1. The other great insanity of the whole rape debacle is the whole “rapists due it for power” myth. Whether or not this is true is almost irrelevant, it is a powerful and unchallenged myth surrounding rape. To question it is truly to blaspheme against the feminist system, the same way you couldn’t blaspheme against God as a Christian in the 1200’s.

    Eivind Berge talks alot about it on his blog how a great number of men simply due because they want sex. I would venture that this number is realistically upwards of 80% of all rape cases, particularly when the victim is not a minor (minor being under 14 in my mind). How sick is this lie? Well it demonizes all men who can’t get laid even more because if you dare raise a finger, dare try and assert your power over women, they will all cry “rape”.

    Of course as we know, the stupid and immoral rape in our society at will without so much as a slap on the wrist in most cases. Nowhere can you find any mainstream politician or normal stupid and immoral person who would just claim, “Yea, they rape out of sexual frustration, whatever power they get/receive/want is irrelevant, if they weren’t sexually frustrated, they wouldn’t rape.” Of course this sane line of reasoning is as dead as the horse and buggie as a means of transportation.

    If there were ever a mass hysteria surrounding a crime in the past or present, the current way our society views rape is up there. As if rape is as bad as brutally murdering someone, even if there are no actual physical injuries during it. The insanity is so crazy that I’m convinced the only thing that will ever break it down is an invasion or a collapse, only then will our priorities change enough so that society will be obsessed with something else.

    Every time a rape scandal comes on tv, millions of men want to simply take vigilante justice or form a mob, without knowing the evidence, the people involved (and their reputations), and the stakes. It’s this insane the sort of animalistic rage fits that a liberal or cuckservative will go into without even taking in any of the facts over these crimes. This is how utterly brainwashed and conditioned they are, this is the consequence of decades of feminist indoctrination.

  2. I’m hoping that we can channel the discussion to more productive subjects, like how you protect yourself from opportunistic women, given that that is a problem even for men who are normally attractive to women — and hence a much greater problem for incels because of their greater need.

    • I agree that this would ideally be more useful than pure descriptions of liberals. But I say ideally because it is quite rare for incels today to be really used by opportunistic women simply because women have basically all of their needs covered without these men. Governments/welfare/laws, as well as their families, provide a lot that women need. I met some incels who were in their 50s and earned quite a lot but were still completely inexperienced, even virgins. I was texting with a single mom last summer and I didn’t feel she wanted to use me at all.

      • I think that there are still some women who would manipulate incels for their own benefit. I actually had an experience with such a woman a few months ago
        Caamib – I am sorry but I can’t let you post to that place as I disagree with its moderation policies.

    • Incels like myself are far too jaded as well as intelligent to fall for that one though. But as much as MRAs and other MGTOW types talk about this threat, I doubt it’s any threat at all. As with gov’t intervention as caamib stated, it becomes unnecessary to ever go for someone they find unattractive but useful. They’ll simply continue down the same destructive path.

  3. So, you’d want to change governments and welfare laws, so as to make women need you more? Something tells me that you wouldn’t get very far with an agenda like that.

    As for the incels who earn a lot, have any of them tried the sugar daddy sites?

    I think I saw something about somehow having helped some incels. Anything to that?

    • I don’t want to change governments or make government do anything at all. I consider Western societies hopeless and in need of destruction. Read my Jan 2016 post on Muslims.

      As for sugar daddy sites, I haven’t heard about any experiences but that’s basically glorified prostitution and thus not a solution. These women are not really fit to be girlfriends/wives.

      • If the constitutional legal systems in USA and Europe were to be replaced with Sharia law, would that make it any easier for you to find a girlfriend?

        Which goal is more important t o you? destroying Western society? or finding a girlfriend?

        • You and I seem to agree on one thing: Western societies are not kind of incels.

          Here in USA, people supposedly believe in the free exchange of ideas — and have since the time of George Washington. But when I even talk about issues related to sexual deprivation, everybody tends to consider me some kind of sexual psychopath.

          What I want most is just one venue, online, offline, or whatever, where the relevant issues can be discussed. And since you, caamib, have some following, I think you can be the leader.

          Is there any way that the incel issues can be addressed, without trampling on women’s rights? Perhaps the Undiscussability Attitude prevails, because people feel strongly feel that there is no way?

          But I can outline at least a few topics that can be productively discussed — such as Cosmopolitan Magazine’s assertion that all women have bartered sex for something — if not for money or something of monetary value, then maybe to gt out of a delicate situation.

          • dokomar Weiner,

            You seem a little confused, so I’ll clarify what’s going on here:
            These men do not want to “destroy” Western society per se; they want to replace it with a better society. And most of us on sites like this cannot have a girlfriend without a better society. So they are synonymous.

            I talk about sexual deprivation too, but nobody treats me like a sexual psychopath. They seem to understand. I think that some people are only giving you a hard time and joking around. So don’t let them discourage you and keep talking about sexual deprivation.

            Trampling on women’s rights? What are you talking about??!!!! Equal rights = no relationships and no sex. Nobody here wants to do any trampling. They simply want to go back to how it was throughout history, where men were rightfully in power.

            and why are you reading Cosmopolitan magazine???!!!!

        • Obviously, finding a girlfriend is more important. But that can’t happen in the West to any incel as long as Muslims haven’t conquered the current degenerate Western culture.

          edit- Regarding rights, I find rights in general to be a pretty nonsensical concept outside of strict legal meaning. If you believe that something like the right to vote is an unalienable natural right then, no, these problems can’t be resolved by not trampling on something like that. But I don’t see it as such.

  4. caamib – What’s truly hilarious is that I am currently not an incel at all. Also, if modern women don’t want to go near me that’s fantastic – we need to get rid of the idea that they should have a right to consensual sex. Non-feminist women should have this right but modern Western women shouldn’t. Now go insult somebody else.

  5. Here is why the Sacred Classes exist. Muslims rape mostly due to cultural conflict. On the other hand blacks and Hispanics rape because they are Prisoners of the Savanna.

    The real evolutionary consequences of feminism and the welfare state is that the West has become Savanna 2.0, something even more anti-provider and pro-seducer than Savanna 1.0s in Sub-Saharan Africa, Southeast Asia and other humid, tropical regions.

    Racially speaking most people here are white, both Jewish and Gentile, and I’m a Northeast Asian. Our ancestors left Africa together and did not separate until 30,000-50,000 years ago in India when my ancestors headed for what is now Burma and your ancestors headed for Pakistan and Iran, which is why you are called a term you should certainly be proud of, Aryan. There is another group of noble people who didn’t leave India at all and they are known as Indians (to some extant. The upper classes in North India are from Iran.) Later our ancestors went to temperate regions and survived in harsh natural and social environments which caused them to evolve high IQ. So we have a lot in common, including having civilizations, long-term planning, etc. Through adaptation to the North our ancestors evolved light skin color to adapt to the North and are evolutionarily freed from the Savanna. Middle Easterners and Indians have been freed from the Savanna for cultural reasons but to a less extant.

    Feminism and the welfare state are basically Savanna 2.0 aka an even more perfect Savanna where food never runs out and seduction is the only factor that matters in a society. I’m glad that our ancestors are from the harsh environment in the North where men had to do agricultural work to feed their wives and kids or they would starve to death which forced women to marry nice providers. On the other hand in the Savanna this does not happen. A woman can easily casually “work” (in a manner that is completely ridiculous by Northern standards) and feed the entire family including the dude because the land is so fertile and free fruits are everywhere. This applies to the African Savanna, the Southeast Asian Savanna and the Latin American Savanna. Even Vietnam where girls traditionally had lovers and lost their virginity to them and then married their arranged suitors is already traditionally much more slutty than anything in Northeast Asia. Thailand is even worse. As for the Philippines and Indonesia they have taken the Savanna to the next level. Women feed men and men seduce women and pimp them out. In Indonesia many lazy men ride motocycles to pick up their wives from factories but don’t bother to work themselves. In the Philippines there are “hardworking” (not really, they are lazy by our standards) women working abroad but few men do that. I’m not sure whether they even use fertilizers at all when they do work on a farm. Well I do know that in Africa many people don’t know the existence of fertilizers…today. Hell other peoples figured that thing out many years ago. It’s not really an issue of inherent inferiority. Instead the problem is the Savanna and its values. I consider people brainwashed by the Savanna victims instead of perpetrators.

    While Japan and most of Northeast Asia have many people too civilized to even have sex any more including me the Savanna is alive and well in many parts of the world. It’s time to mow the Savanna and start building farms and cities. The invasive Savanna must be first stamped out in traditionally civilized areas and then we need a global de-Savanna-ization campaign to completely eradicate both the Savanna and its values. Eventually we should free every single place on this planet from the Savanna because the Savanna if not eradicated can always spread out and be a global problem again just like polio and Ebola. With the Savanna destroyed a new era of human flourishing will come, including in Africa and other places traditionally plagued by the evil Savanna. True racial harmony and prosperity instead of political correctness + ghettos will also be feasible.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s